INVESTOR HREDD PRECISION TOOLS
  • Home
  • The Tools
    • Responsible Contracting >
      • Main Page
      • A Primer
      • Four Resources
    • Certifications Red Flags >
      • Main Page
      • The ​14 Red Flags
      • Our approach
      • Further Reading
    • Stakeholder Engagement Guide >
      • Main Page
      • Pillars and Effectiveness Criteria
      • Financial Materiality
      • Our Approach >
        • Our Approach 2: Lexicon
        • Our Approach 3: Beta version
        • Our Approach 4: Social Dialogue
        • Our Approach 5: CAHRAs
        • Our Approach 6: Acknowledgements
    • Remedy Guide
    • HREDD Corporate Engagement Script
  • HREDD & EU Regulation
  • Collaborate


Stakeholder Engagement Guide (beta)

Embed in management systems
1. Embedded commitment: The company has a policy commitment to ongoing stakeholder engagement, and embeds it in its governance, culture, and management strategy.​
Create a Tailored Engagement Plan​
2. Inclusiveness: The company listens to a full range of rights-holders across the value chain and has a process to identify legitimate representatives.
​
3.
A Focus on Those Most at Risk​:  The company prioritizes engaging with the rightsholders who are most likely to be harmed by its operations​, and therefore where early engagement is critical.​​
Conduct appropriate  activities
​​4. Informed Participation: The company establishes ongoing, two-way communication with affected rights holders that provides affected stakeholders with relevant critical information well in advance of key decision points.

5. Trust and Accountability: The company establishes procedures, tailored to the context, to build rights holder trust and accountability for its actions.​
Ensure follow through
6. Stakeholder-informed Action Plan: The company analyzes information obtained through affected stakeholder engagement and collaborates with rights holders to formulate an action plan.

7. Monitoring, Transparency, and Continuous Improvement​: The company establishes and maintains a transparent and stakeholder-informed monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system.​
effectiveness criterion 4
our approach
financial materiality
Stakeholder Engagement Main Page > Four Pillars > ​Effectiveness Criterion 3
Picture

3. A Focus on Those Most at Risk​​​

The company prioritizes engagement with the rights holders who are most likely to be harmed by its operations, and therefore where early engagement is critical.
what this means
questions for portfolio companies
What to look for
Issue & SEctor considerations
for workers
High risk situations
Considerations for digital technology development: 
Due to rapid innovation cycles, all companies incorporating digital technologies into their goods and services, especially technology companies, should regularly reassess their affected stakeholders, especially when making changes to existing technologies or entering new markets.[1]

[1] Dunstan Allison-Hope and Faris Natour, “Legitimate and Meaningful: Stakeholder Engagement in Human Rights Due Diligence | Reports | Sustainable Business Network and Consultancy | BSR” (BSR, September 2014), 23, https://www.bsr.org/en/reports/engaging-with-rights-holders.
This project is a collaboration among the following organizations:
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
 This site is maintained by Rights CoLab. 
Copyright © 2024
  • Home
  • The Tools
    • Responsible Contracting >
      • Main Page
      • A Primer
      • Four Resources
    • Certifications Red Flags >
      • Main Page
      • The ​14 Red Flags
      • Our approach
      • Further Reading
    • Stakeholder Engagement Guide >
      • Main Page
      • Pillars and Effectiveness Criteria
      • Financial Materiality
      • Our Approach >
        • Our Approach 2: Lexicon
        • Our Approach 3: Beta version
        • Our Approach 4: Social Dialogue
        • Our Approach 5: CAHRAs
        • Our Approach 6: Acknowledgements
    • Remedy Guide
    • HREDD Corporate Engagement Script
  • HREDD & EU Regulation
  • Collaborate